2027 Housing Plans Put Land, Mortgage Finance and Affordability at Centre of Party Proposals

Karsana Estate, Renewed Hope Housing Programme

Nigeria’s housing sector is emerging as a significant policy issue ahead of the 2027 general elections, with political parties outlining different proposals on land administration, mortgage finance, affordable housing, rental housing and construction costs.

The proposals come against a backdrop of rapid urbanisation, rising development costs and limited access to affordable housing. A Guardian report published on September 28 said Nigeria’s housing deficit is estimated at about 15 million units, while the country could require approximately 550,000 new homes annually and about ₦5.5 trillion over the next decade to address the shortfall.

/ You Might Also Like /

The report also highlighted high land costs, limited mortgage access, inadequate infrastructure, lengthy administrative processes and rising building-material prices as major constraints on housing delivery.

Housing Affordability Becomes a 2027 Policy Issue

The housing debate is extending beyond the number of homes political parties promise to construct.

The proposals examined by Guardian focus on some of the structural factors that influence the cost and availability of housing, including access to titled land, long-term mortgage finance, serviced land, rental accommodation, construction materials and private-sector investment.

This shift is significant for the housing market because increasing supply alone does not necessarily make homes affordable. The cost of land, infrastructure, finance, building materials and approvals all affect the final price paid by households.

Guardian reported that cement prices had reached about ₦14,500–₦15,000 per 50kg bag, while reinforcement steel was selling between ₦1.2 million and ₦1.5 million per tonne, depending on location. The publication linked these higher input costs to increased construction costs, property prices and rents.

APC Focuses on Existing Housing Programmes and Mortgage Reform

The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is continuing with the Federal Government’s Renewed Hope Housing Programme, Federal Housing Authority estates and mortgage-related reforms involving the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) and the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN).

The government has previously set a target of delivering 100,000 homes nationwide. According to the Guardian report, the first phase includes housing cities of 1,000 units each across the six geopolitical zones and the Federal Capital Territory, alongside estates of up to 500 units in the remaining 30 states.

The report said work had commenced on more than 3,000 units in Abuja, while a 2,000-unit housing city at Ibeju-Lekki, Lagos, had reached an advanced stage, with sales underway. The government has also stated that more than 15,000 housing units are under construction nationwide.

Housing finance forms another component of the current administration’s programme. The government said 1,859 families across 25 states had secured mortgages worth ₦128 billion through the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund at a fixed interest rate of 9.75%, repayable over 20 years.

The Federal Government has also proposed changes to the mortgage industry, including a National Housing Finance Authority and broader access to housing finance for workers in the informal sector.

SDP Proposes Three Million Affordable Homes

The Social Democratic Party (SDP) has proposed a National Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Programme.

Under the proposal outlined in its manifesto, the party said it would seek to construct at least three million affordable housing units nationwide within four years through public investment, public-private partnerships and cooperative housing schemes.

The party said housing models would be developed for different income groups and occupations, including low-income households, middle-income earners, young professionals, civil servants, artisans, farmers and senior citizens.

Its proposals also include mortgage-finance reforms, cooperative housing and employer-assisted housing.

Land administration is another major part of the SDP proposal. The party identified delays in obtaining Certificates of Occupancy, unclear property rights, overlapping institutional responsibilities and cumbersome registration processes as factors that increase housing costs and discourage investment.

It proposed digital land registries, simplified property registration, transparent land allocation and modern cadastral systems in collaboration with state governments.

The proposed funding structure includes federal budget allocations, state counterpart funding, public-private partnerships, housing bonds, pension-fund investments, concessional development finance, diaspora investment and private capital.

PDP Proposes Social Housing and Land Registry Reforms

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is drawing on housing proposals contained in its 2023 policy agenda, according to the Guardian report.

Its proposals include a National Social Housing Fund, slum upgrading and 20-year mortgages at an interest rate of 10%.

The party has also proposed reforms to land registries and the creation of a nationally interoperable system for transferable property rights. The stated objective is to reduce transaction times, improve access to credit and increase transparency in property transactions.

The PDP also proposed greater use of local building materials, mixed-income communities, public-private partnerships and a review of the Land Use Act to reduce the cost of acquiring land.

Other proposals include grants for site-and-services schemes, research into lower-cost building materials and measures to strengthen mortgage institutions.

AAC Puts Affordable Housing and Long-Term Mortgages on Its Agenda

The African Action Congress (AAC) has proposed affordable housing units at an average cost of ₦2 million per unit.

The party also proposed mortgage financing over 20 years at an interest rate of no more than 10%. According to the Guardian report, the party estimated annual repayments between ₦211,000 and ₦235,000 for the proposed ₦2 million units, depending on whether a 10% deposit is made.

The AAC also proposed using government-owned land valued at $3.64 billion as seed investment for construction and to capitalise an investment fund open to Nigerians.

These proposals place the cost of land and long-term housing finance at the centre of the party’s approach.

ADC Targets Land, Materials and Rental Housing

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has included housing within a wider infrastructure, economic and social-policy agenda.

The party’s housing proposals cover mass social housing, land and finance reform, local production of building materials and rental housing policy.

The ADC has proposed faster land-title processing, lower land costs, serviced land and digitisation of land administration.

On housing finance, its proposals include mortgage reform, rent-to-own schemes, housing cooperatives and pension-backed financing.

The party has also proposed greater local production of cement, steel, roofing materials and tiles, alongside certified alternative building technologies. It has linked the cost of construction to energy and transport expenses and proposed measures to reduce those costs.

Rental housing also forms part of the proposal, with the party calling for greater institutional investment in rental properties and policies aimed at protecting both tenants and landlords.

NDC Links Housing to Infrastructure and Private Capital

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has placed affordable housing and modern towns within its broader infrastructure and industrial-development agenda.

Its published 2027 manifesto summary identifies housing and urban planning alongside areas such as power, roads, rail and ports, while proposing public-private partnerships as part of its broader economic strategy.

The party’s Lagos governorship candidate, Funso Doherty, has provided further details of the approach, including government allocation of suitable land and efforts to increase the scale of housing development.

Doherty also proposed government guarantees to provide institutional backing for investors and lenders, alongside secondary mortgage finance to expand access to housing finance.

The approach places greater emphasis on creating the land, financing and institutional framework for private-sector participation rather than relying solely on government-funded construction.

Land Administration Remains a Common Concern

Despite differences between the parties, land administration appears repeatedly across the various housing proposals.

Digital land registries, faster title processing, transparent land allocation, clearer property rights and improved cadastral systems feature prominently in several of the plans.

Land administration has direct implications for the property market because uncertainty around ownership and lengthy registration procedures can increase transaction costs and complicate the use of property as collateral.

For developers, reliable land documentation can also affect project timelines, financing decisions and investment risk.

The proposals therefore place land reform alongside housing construction rather than treating it as a separate administrative issue.

Mortgage Finance Emerges as Another Key Policy Area

Access to long-term finance is another recurring theme.

The various proposals include lower mortgage rates, longer repayment periods, rent-to-own arrangements, cooperative financing, pension-backed housing finance and secondary mortgage-market mechanisms.

The focus reflects the gap between the cost of residential property and household incomes. For many potential homeowners, the challenge is not simply the availability of houses but the ability to finance their purchase over a period that matches their income.

For developers, mortgage availability also affects effective demand. A larger pool of qualified buyers can support the absorption of new housing developments, while limited mortgage access can push developers towards higher-income segments where buyers have greater purchasing power.

Construction Costs Remain a Major Constraint

The parties’ proposals also recognise the role of construction inputs in determining housing affordability.

The Guardian report highlighted the rise in cement and reinforcement steel prices, while the various party proposals include local production, alternative building technologies, lower energy costs and improved transport infrastructure as potential measures for reducing construction costs.

For the private sector, reducing input costs would affect project viability and the price at which developers can bring new homes to market.

The issue is particularly important for affordable housing, where even relatively small increases in construction costs can push units beyond the purchasing capacity of target households.

Rental Housing Receives Greater Policy Attention

The proposals also reflect the importance of rental housing in Nigeria’s housing market.

Several of the plans address rent-to-own schemes, institutional investment in rental housing and measures aimed at expanding affordable rental supply.

This is significant because housing policy that focuses exclusively on homeownership can overlook households that cannot immediately qualify for mortgages or purchase property.

A larger and more formal rental market could also create opportunities for institutional investors, pension funds and other long-term capital providers, provided the regulatory and investment environment supports such participation.

Implementation Will Determine the Impact of the Proposals

The range of proposals places substantial emphasis on policy frameworks, financing structures and institutional reform.

However, the Guardian report also highlights the implementation challenge facing any administration seeking to address Nigeria’s housing shortage. Political parties have outlined different targets and mechanisms, but delivering housing at scale will require land, infrastructure, finance, construction capacity and coordination across federal, state and local institutions.

The housing sector also operates across several levels of government. Land administration is substantially influenced by state-level systems, while housing finance, infrastructure, planning and construction involve multiple federal and subnational institutions.

For investors and developers, the practical question will therefore extend beyond the number of units contained in a manifesto. It will include the availability of development-ready land, financing costs, infrastructure, regulatory certainty, construction economics and the purchasing power of intended buyers.

Outlook

The 2027 election cycle has placed housing policy more prominently within the national political discussion, with parties proposing measures covering land administration, mortgage finance, affordable and rental housing, construction costs and private-sector investment.

The proposals differ in their targets, financing mechanisms and institutional approaches, but the recurring policy areas point to the structural nature of Nigeria’s housing challenge.

For the housing and real estate market, the significance of the debate will ultimately depend on how policy commitments address the underlying economics of housing delivery. Land costs, mortgage access, construction inputs, infrastructure and household affordability will remain central to whether future housing programmes can translate policy proposals into sustainable supply.

READ MORE